From our very early tests with a single-deck RXN we have noted an impressive amount of improvement in both power and efficiency. It’s hard not to wonder what happens to a larger RXN when it reaches 2.4GHz, or even 3GHz? After all, we’ve never seen anything like this since the NVIDA RX 480 launch back in 2008 – let alone an overclocked and overvolted GeForce GTX Titan.
A few things to look for when evaluating an overclocked RXN:
How much voltage will the card require? A single card may not require any more than the reference design requires, but you will need to monitor the power draw for your custom cards and ensure that the RXN can deliver power without sacrificing performance.
How much memory will you get? If you’re overclocking multiple cards within the same package, it’s important to make sure to monitor the memory frequency for each card so you know how much to boost each card’s memory. The following charts were generated by overclocking the GTX 1060 6GB and the RX 480, but should work for other cards as well.
How hard will the temperature hit of the card? This is one of the hardest numbers to calculate. With multiple cards running at the same time, it’s not always possible to accurately measure the temperature of each of them individually, especially when we’re not monitoring the ambient air temperature – a few times we had to adjust the fan speeds manually to get a ballpark figure.
The GTX 1060 has been reported as using 60C on average at the highest frequencies it supported without trouble, though it’s worth remembering that it uses a very cool GPU design, and the temperatures it experiences are certainly not “normal.” At stock and overclocked, the cooler temperatures are just about as low as they can go without being a safety risk if the card does become overheated.
A single-card RXN that hits 2.4GHz at high temperatures with a reference design GPU still runs with the same level of efficiency as a dual-GPU card does.
On our single-card overclock we found that the boost clock improved performance as much as 60%] while the base clock improved by 25%. The base clock was also slightly faster, though not much. The boost clock was more than 50% faster than the reference clock, and the overclock itself was almost twice as fast when compared with a single card (with a ~15ppm lower frequency at 2.4
free energy generator magnet pdf to word, free energy definition thermodynamics problems and solution, equation relating gibbs free energy and equilibrium constant, free energy generation with magnets, free energy generator project observation